Reviewdle 27 – Style squared
The Brothers Bloom ![]()
Rian Johnson (Brick) is a terrifically
interesting film-maker and a very talented writer. The Brother’s Bloom looks GREAT, I mean really great– the detail of the design is minute and yet Johnson’s touch is kept light and the pace kept jaunty. The energy established in the first 4/5ths dissipates as the ending(s) overreach, but for the majority of its running length it frolics and bounds along superbly, propelled by some very fine performances. ADRIEN BRODY (The Darjeeling Limited) and MARK RUFFALO (Zodiac) are con-men brothers who have set their sites on RACHEL WEISZ (The Constant Gardener and the Mummy movies*), a social awkward and slightly off-kilter millionaire. Their ruse is elaborate and lines of trust and stretched, bowed and twisted as they try to pull off the perfect con– the con in which everyone gets what they want. It’s worth checking out to see if they pull it off.
A Serious Man ![]()
I’m usually nervous about Coen brothers’ movies.
You just never know what you’re going to get. Let’s see: No Country for Old Men (genius); Burn After Reading (lame); The Big Lebowski (awesome); The Ladykillers (dire); O Brother, Where Art Thou? (wonderful). But this? The preview gave nothing away (which in hindsight is a good thing), so my expectations were far from set. But I ended up liking this small, contained, gentle story very much indeed. A fortnight of tiny catastrophes forces Larry Gopnik (MICHAEL STUHLBARG, a relative unknown) to examine himself, his family and his God. It’s set in 60s suburban Minnesota and the design and cinematography are wonderfully evocative. It might be due to the preview (which is odd and wonderful), but it also seemed to me that the sound of the film is evocative too. The cadence and rhythm of the sound effects subtly added tension and claustrophobia to the escalating story. There’s not much I didn’t enjoy about this film – the direction, writing and performances (especially Stuhlbarg) are all great, it’s the stylish design that really shines.
* If you deny the existence of Mummy 3, as I do, then I think you’ll find that Rachel Weisz is in fact in all the Mummy movies.
– Jen






